Imagine inheriting your late father’s home, only to discover that living in it could trigger a legal dispute with your homeowners association (HOA). That’s the situation Florida influencer Bethany Michel says she’s facing after inheriting a home in a 55+ community.
The HOA has approved a mandatory $1,000 assessment for each of its 155 residents to fund legal action aimed at removing her from the property. While the story has drawn widespread attention online, legal experts say the dispute largely comes down to the difference between owning a home and having the legal right to live in it.
Background
Bethany Michel, 28, inherited her father’s home in Freedom at Arbor Mill, a Florida neighborhood designated as a 55+ community. According to the community’s governing documents, every occupied home must have at least one resident who is 55 years of age or older.
Michel has stated on social media that her father signed an addendum allowing her to inherit the property. However, while the document appears to protect her ownership rights, it does not clearly state that she may continue living in the home.
This distinction has become the central issue in the dispute.
Assessment
To pursue legal action, the HOA board voted to impose a mandatory $1,000 assessment on all 155 homeowners. The assessment will generate approximately $155,000 to cover legal expenses.
| Assessment Details | Amount |
|---|---|
| Residents affected | 155 |
| Fee per homeowner | $1,000 |
| Total assessment | $155,000 |
Because Michel is also the homeowner, she would reportedly be required to pay the same assessment that will fund the lawsuit involving her occupancy.
Michel has also expressed concern about the financial impact on many elderly residents who live on fixed incomes.
Rules
Age-restricted communities operate under the federal Housing for Older Persons Act (HOPA), which allows qualifying neighborhoods to enforce age-based occupancy restrictions.
Legal experts explain that HOPA generally requires that at least 80% of occupied homes include a resident who is 55 years of age or older. Communities must also comply with their own declarations, covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&Rs).
This means that while ownership of a home can transfer through inheritance, occupancy rights may still be limited by community rules.
Ownership
One of the key legal distinctions in cases like this is the difference between owning a property and living in it.
Real estate attorneys note that inheriting a home does not automatically override HOA restrictions. The heir typically assumes ownership under the same contractual obligations accepted by the previous owner.
In Michel’s case, legal experts believe she may legally own the home while still being prohibited from residing there if she does not meet the community’s age requirements.
Exceptions
Some 55+ communities allow hardship exceptions or occupancy waivers under certain circumstances.
Whether Michel qualifies depends on the language of the community’s governing documents and whether the HOA is willing to approve an exception.
Attorneys also point out that if the HOA has previously allowed younger residents to remain in similar situations, those earlier decisions could become relevant during any legal proceedings.
Legal
Legal professionals generally believe the HOA currently has the stronger position because the community’s governing documents clearly outline occupancy requirements.
However, Michel could still examine several legal questions, including:
- Whether the HOA has consistently enforced its age restrictions.
- Whether previous exceptions have been granted.
- Whether the community continues to meet HOPA requirements.
- Whether the inheritance agreement provides additional occupancy rights.
Even so, legal experts caution that these arguments may be difficult to establish based on the available information.
Options
If no hardship exemption is granted and the courts uphold the HOA’s position, Michel’s practical choices may be limited.
Possible options include:
| Option | Outcome |
|---|---|
| Request hardship exemption | HOA may approve occupancy |
| Challenge HOA in court | Outcome uncertain |
| Rent to an eligible resident | Maintain ownership and earn rental income |
| Sell the property | Avoid ongoing legal dispute |
Selling or renting the home to someone who satisfies the age requirement could resolve the dispute while allowing Michel to retain financial value from the property.
Impact
The case has attracted public attention because it highlights the legal complexities surrounding inherited property in age-restricted communities.
It also raises broader questions about balancing community rules with individual circumstances. While many people sympathize with Michel’s situation, courts generally give significant weight to properly adopted HOA covenants and the legal protections available to age-restricted housing communities.
Anyone inheriting property in a 55+ community should carefully review the governing documents and seek legal advice before assuming they can occupy the home. Knowing the difference between ownership rights and residency requirements can help avoid costly legal disputes.
FAQs
Can someone inherit a home in a 55+ community?
Yes, ownership can be inherited, but occupancy rules may still apply.
Why did the HOA charge a $1,000 assessment?
The fee helps fund legal action related to the occupancy dispute.
Does owning the home guarantee the right to live there?
No. Ownership and occupancy are legally separate issues.
What is the Housing for Older Persons Act?
It allows qualifying communities to enforce age-based occupancy rules.
What options does the homeowner have?
She may seek an exemption, challenge the case, rent, or sell the home.
Bill Maher Says It’s Time to Stop Obsessing Over Donald Trump’s Personality